UP Lawyer Criticizes Rep. Zarzar for Challenging Senatorial Candidates

first_imgHaving challenged the eligibility of several candidates of the ruling Unity Party (UP), to contest the pending special senatorial elections, Sinoe County, District #3 Representative Matthew Zarzar has been heavily criticized by executives of the party.Rep. Zarzar, a UP executive, wrote a complaint against presidential appointed officials that won their primaries and were  qualified by the National Elections Commission (NEC) to contest the special senatorial elections.In his complaint, the Sinoe Lawmaker claimed that the officials continue to perform their executive functions in contravention of part five of the 2014 Code of Conduct Act.He said it was wrong  for presidential appointees who were elected by their parties to contest the elections to continue performing their executive functions.Besides, he said, the National Elections Commission should furnish him with the full names of all public officials who are in that category. However, an executive of the party, who addressed journalists on Tuesday, September 2, described the lawmaker’s action as “disappointing and an act of complete dishonesty.”Atty. Miller Catakaw  said, they were shocked and disappointed by the manner in which their executive was going about challenging his own members, who are senatorial candidates of the party. “Why would the party executive challenged his colleagues?” Atty. Catakwa wondered.He went to say; “It was the party that made him a representative; we all rallied around him, to get him to where he is.   How would he fight others and the party’s decision.”According to the lawyer, Zarzar’s complaint to the NEC  has been dismissed.“NEC said that the complaint lacked substance, because he filed it after the constitutional period provided for an individual to challenge the candidacy of an aspirant,” Atty. Catakwa asserted, quoting NEC’s ruling.“His action has brought the party into  public ridicule. He benefited from the party and does not want other executives to enjoy similar opportunity,” the UP lawyer emphasized. “Rep. Zarzar is enjoying [benefits] from the party and is now trying to undermine the efforts  of other executives.” The lawyer added,  “We are surprised by  the UP executive’s action. He benefited from the arrangement of the party and now he is fighting other partisans from enjoying similar [gestures].”Lamenting the behavior of Rep. Zarzar at the time the nation is fighting against the deadly Ebola virus, Atty. Catakwa said, “Instead of worrying about measures to defeat the Ebola virus that is killing our people, he is going about fighting his own partisans.Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)last_img read more

SOCU Prosecutor a no-show

first_imgPradoville land saleThe Special Organised Crime Unit’s (SOCU) prosecutor was a no-show in court on Monday when the Pradoville land sale case was called at the Georgetown Magistrates’ Courts.Chief MagistrateAnn McLennanPeople’s Progressive Party Presidential Candidate Irfaan Ali, is before the court as a result of trumped-up political motivated charges for allegedly selling State lands under market value, was present in court with his lawyers when the matter was called. After the prosecutor failed to make an appearance, Chief Magistrate Ann McLennan adjourned the case to September 27, 2019. Ali’s lawyers informed the Chief Magistrate that they intend to file proceedings in the full court for a stay in the matter.High Court Judge Dawn Gregory, on Friday last did not grant a stay order.Ali is facing 19 charges in relation to the sale of land in the ‘Pradoville 2’ Housing Scheme between 2010-2015. He was serving as Housing Minister during the time.last_img read more